Prosperity Law
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Conveyancing
    • Commercial Disputes
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Commercial Property Law
    • Corporate And Commercial
    • Debt Recovery
    • Employment Law – Individuals
    • Employment Law – Businesses
    • Healthcare Services
    • High Net Worth Clients
    • Insolvency Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Settlement Agreements
  • Notary Public
  • Clients
  • Our People
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Tel: 0161 667 3686, 0151 958 0057

The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court – What’s Next?

Home / Blog / Insurance / The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court – What’s Next?
March 6, 2018
by para
Insurance
0 Comments

Europe’s patent system is looking uncertain. Plans for a Unified Patent Court (UPC) have been thrown into doubt after the German Constitutional Court agreed to hear a case about the legitimacy of the proposed court – and part of the complaint against it appears to relate to Brexit.

The intention behind the UPC is for it to act as a patent court for all European Union member states. As such, it will have exclusive competence over European patents and European patents with unitary effect, and will form part of the judicial system of contracting member states. It will not have competence in respect of national patents.

In February 2013, an Agreement on a Unified Patent Court was signed as an intergovernmental treaty by all member states with the exception of Croatia, Portugal and Spain. At the date of writing, only Portugal and Spain have yet to sign. Originally due to be in place by 2015, the UPC has faced various hold-ups and obstacles. Last year, only days before ratification was at last expected, the German Constitutional Court put the brakes on by agreeing to hear the legal challenge.

The actual complaint brought before the German Constitutional Court is unpublished but its essence is that the UPC would break German law. An information request by a German Intellectual Property lawyer has elicited the information that one strand of the complaint concerns Brexit and the UK’s planned withdrawal from the EU.

[bctt tweet=”The Brexit connection stems from the fact that the terms of the UPC require France, Germany and the UK to ratify the proposed approach” username=”ProsperityLLP”]

The Brexit connection stems from the fact that the terms of the UPC require France, Germany and the UK to ratify the proposed approach, with the reason for this being that these states represent the largest number of patents filed. The effect of UK’s forthcoming withdrawal from the EU is unclear. Although indications from Westminster are that the UK government still plans to ratify the UPC and that support for it remains strong in government circles, this has not been enough to stifle concerns in Germany.

If it is ratified, what will be the effect of the UPC in the UK?

Many in Westminster regard the existing European patent system as costly, fragmented and tricky for businesses to negotiate. It is often necessary to maintain several patent rights, each covering separate countries and each of which must be enforced in separate national courts. The UPC offers a workaround that will enable businesses to enforce or challenge patents in multiple countries with a single court action. According to Lord Henley, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, in the House of Lords, “…independent research shows that around a quarter of all patent cases heard in United Kingdom courts were also litigated in other European jurisdictions between the same parties…”

British businesses will retain the option to choose national patents and to litigate in national courts. However, it appears that the UK government recognises the wisdom in allowing businesses to use the UPC as an alternative. Although Lord Henley goes on to state that “[the UK government’s] commitment to proceed with preparations to ratify the international agreement that sets up the United Patent Court…that commitment should not be seen as pre-empting the negotiations on leaving the EU”, it remains to be seen whether the German Constitutional Court agrees. For now, the matter is very much one of “watch this space”.

For any further information, please get in touch with your usual Prosperity Law contact or any member of our team, or follow us @ProsperityLLP for breaking news and commentary.

Share
Previous Post
Are you planning to live or work abroad?
Next Post
Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices: What employers need to know

Leave a Reply - Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (required)

Categories
  • About
  • Copyright
  • Covid-19
  • Employment
  • Events
  • GDPR
  • Healthcare
  • Insurance
  • Law
  • News
  • Notary Public
  • Solicitors
  • Tax
  • Uncategorized
MANCHESTER OFFICE

Vantage Point 4, Hardman Street, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3HF
Opening Hours: Mon-Fri 9am- 5.30pm

Get Directions

Tel: 0161 667 3686

Follow Us
Useful Links
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Our People
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Latest News
  • Employer FAQ’s – Changing Employee Terms & Conditions
  • 2021 – A New Year in Dentistry
  • Prosperity Law Liverpool Appoints New Partner
Liverpool Office

4 St. Paul Square, Liverpool, L3 9SJ
Phone: 0151 958 0057
Opening Hours: Mon-Fri 9am- 5.30pm

Get Directions

Copyright Prosperity Law © 2020. All Rights Reserved Sitemap Prosperity Law LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (number OC340697) authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA 533585). whose registered address is at The Office Suite Top O’Th Hill Farm, Meadowhead Lane Norden, Rochdale, Lancs, OL11 5UL. A list of members is available at each office.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Necessary Always Enabled